Skip to content
← All stories

AI Security

US federal agencies ordered to remove Chinese AI service DeepSeek

US federal civilian agencies must stop using DeepSeek and related AI products, following a Department of Homeland Security order. The ban is broad and raises questions about compliance and the risks of foreign AI models.

Ross GrantUpdated 3 min read

AI chip glowing inside a circuit board

The short version

The US government has told its civilian agencies to stop using DeepSeek, a Chinese AI service, and any products built with it. The order is broad and may be hard to follow because many agencies might not know if their software uses DeepSeek in the background. Experts say the ban is difficult to enforce and may go beyond what is needed for security. This story shows how hard it is to track what AI tools are used in complex systems.

What happened?

The US Department of Homeland Security has ordered all federal civilian agencies to stop using DeepSeek, a Chinese AI service, and to remove any related products. The order is broad, covering DeepSeek, its affiliates, and third-party products developed using DeepSeek. It is unclear how agencies will identify all affected products, especially those using AI gateways. Only The Register has reported this so far.

Who is affected

The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has ordered all federal civilian agencies to stop using technology from DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) lab. The order also covers any DeepSeek-affiliated products and third-party services developed using DeepSeek implementations. This means not only DeepSeek's own software, but also any tools or services that might use DeepSeek's AI models behind the scenes. The Register reports that complying will be difficult, as agencies may not always know which products rely on DeepSeek, especially when using AI gateways like OpenRouter or Vercel AI Gateway that can route requests to DeepSeek models without users realising it. The DHS has not yet clarified the full scope of the ban.The Register (opens in a new tab)

The response

The DHS order follows earlier moves by other US government bodies. The Pentagon's Defense Information Systems Agency blocked DeepSeek in January 2025. The US Navy, NASA, and the House of Representatives have also banned the service. Some US states have taken similar action. Lawmakers previously proposed a bill to ban DeepSeek on government devices, citing national security concerns, but it did not pass. Despite this, agencies have acted independently to restrict DeepSeek's use.

What experts say

Katie Moussouris, CEO of Luta Security, told The Register that banning DeepSeek's own app and API is practical, but the order's broad language makes compliance almost impossible. She points out that the order could technically cover any software developed with help from DeepSeek, even if only used during code writing or testing. There is currently no way for vendors to prove their products never used DeepSeek, since software bills of materials do not track which AI tools developers used. Moussouris also notes that the main risks cited, data flowing to DeepSeek's servers in China and possible vulnerabilities, are not unique to DeepSeek, and US-hosted versions of the models would avoid most of those concerns.

How the flaw works

Concerns about DeepSeek include the possibility that its AI models could capture sensitive data and send it to servers in China. Past reports on DeepSeek's mobile apps for iOS and Android found issues such as plaintext data leaks, connections to Chinese tech firm servers, and lack of SSL pinning (a security feature that helps prevent man-in-the-middle attacks). The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found DeepSeek more vulnerable to prompt injection (where attackers trick AI models into doing things they should not) than some US models, and easier to jailbreak (bypass safety controls). However, these are problems seen in many AI models, not just DeepSeek.

What you should do

For government agencies and contractors, the main action is to review their use of AI services and check whether any systems or software rely on DeepSeek or its models, directly or indirectly. This includes checking with vendors and being cautious with AI gateways that may route requests to DeepSeek. For the wider security community, the case highlights the challenge of tracking the origins and dependencies of AI models in complex software supply chains.

Why it matters

This order affects how US government agencies use AI, raising questions about supply chain transparency and national security. It also highlights the practical challenges of enforcing broad technology bans in large organisations.

Key points

  1. US federal agencies must remove DeepSeek and related AI products.
  2. The ban covers direct and indirect use, making compliance difficult.
  3. Experts warn the order is too broad to enforce effectively.
  4. Security concerns focus on data leaks and prompt injection risks.
  5. Tracking AI dependencies in software is a major challenge.

Sources

  1. The Register

    Reference

The day's cyber news in 5 minutes.

Cyberend Daily is one short email with the stories that matter, written so anyone can follow.

Free beginner roadmap PDF when you join · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime