Vulnerabilities · Threat Intelligence
Attackers Hijack Domain Registries to Obtain Certificates for Google and Others
Attackers compromised three country-code domain registries and obtained unauthorised HTTPS certificates for Google and other organisations. Chrome users are protected, but risks remain for others.
Ross GrantUpdated 3 min read
The short version
Attackers broke into the systems that manage certain country-code domains and used this access to get security certificates for Google websites. These certificates could let someone pretend to be a real Google site and read private data. Google blocked the fake certificates in Chrome and worked with others to revoke them. Users of other browsers may still be at risk.
By the numbers
- 12Certificates for Google and YouTube domains found in CT logsThe Hacker News
- 3ccTLD registries compromised (.gh, .sl, .as)The Hacker News
- 7Google and YouTube domains affectedThe Hacker News
- 1.5 daysShortest time from certificate issue to revocationThe Hacker News
- 1 weekLongest time from certificate issue to revocationThe Hacker News
What happened?
Attackers compromised the registries for the .gh, .sl, and .as country-code domains and obtained unauthorised HTTPS certificates for several Google domains. Google said its own systems were not breached, but domains under these ccTLDs were at risk. Chrome blocked the certificates, and they were revoked by the issuing authorities.
What happened to the domain registries?
In late September 2026, attackers compromised the registries for three country-code top-level domains (ccTLDs): .gh (Ghana), .sl (Sierra Leone) and .as (American Samoa) [The Hacker News (opens in a new tab)]. By gaining control over the DNS records for these domains, the attackers were able to request and obtain HTTPS certificates for several Google domains, including google.com.gh, google.sl and google.as. These certificates are meant to prove that a website is genuine and to encrypt traffic between users and the site.
Google confirmed the incident on 6 October 2026. The company said its own systems were not breached, but any domain under the affected ccTLDs was at risk. The attack also affected other organisations, including well-known global brands and widely used online services, though Google did not name them [BleepingComputer (opens in a new tab)][Infosecurity Magazine (opens in a new tab)].
How did the attackers get the certificates?
To get an HTTPS certificate, a Certificate Authority (CA) must confirm that the requester controls the domain. This is usually done by adding a special record to the domain's DNS. By hijacking the registries, the attackers could change DNS records and pass these checks, even though they did not own the domains. Let's Encrypt issued 11 of the 12 certificates found, and ZeroSSL issued one. The certificates were issued between 22 and 27 September 2026, one ccTLD at a time.
Certificate Transparency (CT) logs, which publicly record all certificates issued, show at least 12 certificates for Google and YouTube domains under the three ccTLDs. The real number could be higher, as only a small set of names was checked.
What did Google and others do in response?
Google used Chrome's CRLSets, an emergency mechanism, to block the unauthorised certificates for its domains. It also worked with the CAs to revoke the certificates, which protects users of other browsers and apps. By 7 October, all 12 certificates had been revoked. The shortest time between a certificate being issued and revoked was about a day and a half. The longest was nearly a week.
Google also blocked certificates for other organisations it believed were affected and contacted them where possible. The company warned that its analysis might not have found every affected domain, and that Chrome's protections do not cover users of other browsers.
What is the risk to users and domain owners?
With a valid certificate, an attacker could impersonate a trusted site and intercept or read private data sent to it. There is no public evidence so far that the certificates were used in this way, but Google has not ruled it out. Chrome users are protected by the emergency blocks, but users of other browsers may still be at risk if a revoked certificate is used before the browser updates its records.
Domain owners under .gh, .sl or .as should check CT logs for certificates they did not request. Google recommends publishing a strict Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) record in DNS, which limits which CAs can issue certificates for a domain. However, this does not stop an attacker who controls DNS during a hijack, but it does help once control is restored.
What should domain owners do now?
Google advises domain owners to:
- Monitor CT logs for all their domains, including regional and parked domains.
- Publish a strict CAA record naming only their chosen CA.
- Report any unauthorised certificates to the CA that issued them. CAs must investigate and respond quickly.
The rules for how long a CA can reuse a domain check are changing. By 2029, the maximum will be 10 days, down from the current 200 days for some CAs. Let's Encrypt already limits this to 30 days and plans to reduce it further.
What is still unclear?
The sources do not name the attackers, explain how the registries were compromised, or confirm whether any certificates were actively used to attack users. There is also no confirmation that the registries have been secured.
Claimed vs confirmed
- Confirmed
Attackers obtained unauthorised certificates for Google domains by hijacking ccTLD registries.
Google confirmed the certificates were issued and revoked, and that its own systems were not breached.
- Unconfirmed
Other major brands and online services were also affected.
Google said CT data pointed to other organisations but did not name them.
- Unconfirmed
The certificates were used to attack users or intercept data.
Google did not say whether the certificates were used in attacks.
The impact
- Money
- There is no public estimate of financial loss. If a UK or EU company was affected and user data was compromised, GDPR fines could reach up to £17.5m or 4% of global turnover.
- Reputation
- Trust in the affected ccTLDs and their operators may be damaged. Google’s quick response limited the visible impact for its users, but the incident highlights risks in core internet infrastructure.
- Customers
- Anyone using sites under .gh, .sl or .as could have been at risk of attackers impersonating trusted brands. Chrome users are protected, but users of other browsers should be cautious and domain owners should check for unauthorised certificates.
Why it matters
Anyone using sites under the affected domains could have been exposed to attackers impersonating trusted brands, including Google. The incident highlights the risks when core internet infrastructure is compromised, and shows that browser-based protections may not cover everyone.
How does it work?
Attackers took control of the DNS records for domains under .gh, .sl, and .as. This allowed them to pass certificate validation checks and obtain HTTPS certificates from Certificate Authorities. With these certificates, they could impersonate trusted sites and intercept encrypted traffic.
Key points
- Attackers compromised three ccTLD registries and obtained certificates for Google domains.
- Google's own systems were not breached, but many domains were at risk.
- Chrome blocked the fake certificates and they were revoked by the CAs.
- Other browsers may not protect users as quickly as Chrome does.
- Domain owners should monitor CT logs and use strict CAA records.
Sources
The Hacker News
Reference
BleepingComputer
Reference
Infosecurity Magazine
Reference
- Attackers Hijack Three ccTLDs to Obtain Google Certificates (opens in a new tab)
infosecurity-magazine.com
- Attackers Hijack Three ccTLDs to Obtain Google Certificates (opens in a new tab)




